PD Dr. Lorenz Trein
English title: Secularization and History at the Limits of Religion
In the field of critical secularism studies, an interest in a genealogical concept of secularization has been emerging for some time (for instance in the works of Talal Asad and Gil Anidjar), in order to explore secular discourses and practices as a continuation of religious-theological distinctions and narratives no longer recognised as such because they have been secularized. In this debate, strongly influenced by postcolonialism and reference to Islam and the question of the relatiions between religions, there are repeated references to an older, primarily German-language discussion about the modern age and secularized eschatology (for example in Karl Löwth, Hans Blumenberg, Rudolf Bultmann, Wolfhart Pannenberg), which played an important role, particularly in the years after the Second World War, but which died down in the 1970s. Important for the current debate is the question of whether "Protestantism" produced ideas and practices of religion which make it harder to understand other religions. While the older debate about secularization, modernity and Christianity is proving itself to be extraordinarily productive for the current discussion of the category of the secular, historical references and "indeterminacies" (Blumenberg) in the older debate have barely come into view.
In terms of genealogy and the history of ideas, the current critique of the category of the secular and its challenges for an understanding of other religions can be traced back to debates in the context of historicism and history of religion in the period around the First World War, as well as to a critique, beginning in the late 19th century, of an assumption in theology and history of philosophy that the Kingdom of God would be achieved and realised in the history of the world. The project combines perspectives from the history of discourse and ideas on the connection between secularization and history of religion with a sociological reflection, inspired by Niklas Luhmann, on distinctions in the secularization discourse. In addition to the religious/secular distinction, "culture" and "history" will be explored as frameworks for reflecting on and describing religion, as well as the afterlife of the secularization debate in discussions of climate change and contemporary protest movements.
Link to publisher