Abstract
Does the authoritativeness of democratic decisions depend on the competence of the electorate? The idea is taken to be either incompatible with fundamental democratic values or premised on a purely instrumental outlook on political legitimacy. The project outlines an alternative approach to the issue, centred on the idea that co-participation in democratic decision-making jointly commits citizens to uphold significant epistemic responsibilities. On the resulting view, while legitimate political decision-making does require epistemic preconditions and constraints, the rationale is not the achievement of ‘better’ political outcomes but rather the achievement of a proper collective co-authorship of political decisions.
Project information
- Project title
- Ruling as Knowers: Political Legitimacy between Epistemic and Civic Accountability
- Funded by
- DFG
- Project link
- -
- Project duration
- 01.10.2025 - 30.09.2027
- Funds awarded
- 230056€
- Project team
- -
- Associated Chair
- Chair of Philosophy and Political Theory